By Red S. Original article found here
The following has been excerpted in part from a talk given by Red S. for the DSA NYC’s Strike & Labor Solidarity working group. Red currently organizes with the Support Ho(s)e Collective, coordinates the Justice for Alisha Walker defense campaign and actively works with Survived & Punished New York City. They are also co-organizing nationwide efforts against Fosta/Sesta under the banner of #SurvivorsAgainstSESTA and #LetUsSurvive to highlight the resistance of sex workers and survivors--specifically helping to coordinate and signal boost organizing efforts for International Whores Day on June 2nd. Image courtesy of artist Audrey Ryan. It’s important to be intentional and deliberate with the language we share when talking about criminalized and stigmatized workers. So often those most affected are disallowed from the terms of discussion, denied their own words and characterizations of their experiences. Let’s confront that by creating a shared language and understanding of the terms that will be in use... Sex work is an umbrella term used by many to encompass all sorts of erotic labor, practice, and trade. This includes, but is not limited to, full service providers, escorting, cam work, adult film performers, dommes, stripping, sugar baby work, fetish provision, etc. It’s work. A lot of it is unfortunately criminalized because of patriarchal moral panic, white supremacy, anti-immigrant sentiment, and misogyny. The term ‘sex work’ was coined by Carol Leigh in the 1980s and is useful in organizing efforts to build solidarity and break down whorearchy (or the internal stratification of labor/hierarchy within the sex industry) as well as push back against the anti-sex work so-called feminists who refuse to acknowledge erotic labor as labor. Labor trafficking is forced or coerced labor, debt bondange, wage theft, or outright wage denial, and in the case of those being trafficked for sexual labor, abuse, assault, and often rape. It’s not work that someone elects to do. Most often you’ll hear sex trafficking, child sex trafficking, or human trafficking to make for a more salacious policy headline or shocking article title--and often even when the circumstances do not reflect or warrant such characterizations of exploitation or abuse. Capitalism necessitates the labor exploitation of workers. Any job where you are unable to dictate or determine your working conditions, or compensation, is exploitative. Any job where you have to sell your labor power for a wage that you do not determine is exploitative. Working under capitalism is complicated. Working identities are complicated. Sometimes survivors of labor trafficking might also identify as sex working or trading sex in ways that were necessary for them. Some sex workers have survived violence. Some survivors of trafficking will engage in sex work on their own terms before or after surviving trafficking. Most sex workers are confronted by stigma and whorephobia; this plays out differently depending on lived experience and other systemic oppressions. Some folks need to trade or engage in survival sex to get by. We need to be able to honor and speak to the experiences of folks in the trade/industry who are most impacted and affected by criminalization if we all want safer and autonomous work places and to effectively organize for decriminalization. We can only mitigate and hopefully reduce harm, fight for better conditions, workers’ organizations, unions, better compensation, while we organize to overthrow capitalism. Any kind of work where the bosses have more power (which is the majority of what we call work) and any kind of work under a society that forces us to labor for a wage is going to be inherently based in exploitation and maximum profit extraction. Think about the role national borders play in making some work far more exploitative than other jobs. Think about criminalization and how that endangers all kinds of workers every day. For most sex-working people laboring means constant precarity; and it means advocating for immediate survival. Sex workers have this in common with other marginalized and criminalized working people, and those whose work isn’t seen as work. Recently there has been a shift in language, moving away from mere survival towards a desire to demand more and a desire to thrive. This is a hell of a shift in community spaces and in the media. Sex workers are shifting the narrative, demanding to not just be seen as human beings, but angry, complicated, resilient human beings. With a narrative shift like this happening in the mainstream, or at least in the independent media, we should be bold. We should keep pushing and demanding people expand their horizons of what is possible to achieve through struggle. For a left that is infatuated with raising humanity’s horizon line to seek alternative economic structures in the immediate--socialism-- to hopefully work toward the radical transformation of society--full communism/anarchism-- ushering in (among other so-called utopian socialist ideas) the abolition of money and private property, the nuclear family, etc I kinda think calling a harm reduction and an intrinsically pro-worker position like decrim “pie in the sky” or “niche issue,” is bullshit. We need to organize around the decriminalization of all erotic labor. No worker should be criminalized for the work that they do (except cops and prison guards, for whom I offer no job protection in my labor philosophy/analysis). All workers deserve the right to organize freely without harassment or fear of violent reprisal. As long as we live under a system that requires us to labor for a wage, workers deserve the opportunity to pursue safe and equitable work environments. As radicals, socialists, anarchists, Marxists, we must proceed from this position of workers’ building collective power amongst workers and the unemployed. Decriminalization as a goal and practical organizing position necessarily requires harm reduction strategies that inform what tactics we may engage in when defending and supporting worker-led struggles. What decriminalization should look like:
- Immediate moratorium on arrests/raids of sex workers and clients
- Revocation of punitive laws surrounding sex work
- Immediate channeling of all county, state police funds for prostitution arrests into actual harm reduction programs that have sex worker input and oversight. Yes, this would be a deliberate move toward defunding and divesting from the police.
- Immediate release of all sex workers who are incarcerated for prostitution charges or charges relating to their self-defense while performing erotic labor.
- Policy-based and nuanced decoupling of sex work from labor trafficking; and the expansion of cash assistance, housing assistance, visa/asylum assistance to all those who are survivors of trafficking violence without forced victimizing language that’s currently required to access these emergency services.
- Inclusion of ‘sex worker’ as a potential protected category to combat the discrimination workers experience when being barred from public services (accessing health care, recourse to challenge police violence, affordable housing programs etc).